3. Mengabdikah di BUMN? Lebih Sulitkah? - Mengabdikah in SOEs? More Difficult?

Mengabdikah di BUMN? Lebih Sulitkah? - Online Article (Bahasa)

Mengabdikah in SOEs? More Difficult?
National Journal | Monday, 5 Dec 2011
By Dahlan IskanMinister for SOEsREALLY become executives in SOEs are more difficult than in private? Is it true that the directors in the company the country's more to eat liver? More tortured? More confined to the bureaucracy? More twisted rules? Over there is no hope?He replied: I do not know.There has been no scientific research. That there is then a rumor. Perception. The presumption.What if reversed: it not possible that assumption is just a reflection of the adage "the grass is greener on the page? 'Or even more negative again: as a scapegoat? That is a scapegoat for the justification of the failure? Or a scapegoat for a disability?To be more fair, you should also hear the voices from the private sector executive.They certainly could have much to tell. For example the story of how stressful it reach targets of the company owners. On the side is clearly an executive in private is much more difficult. A private executive who can not hit the target directly in front of his sentence: dismissed. Even if more bad luck, the owner of a company facing a dirty mouth of a private executive's like the inhabitants of the zoo.In the state the consequences of not achieving the target does not exist. Minister representing the owners of at least SOE will never berate executives in public.What about the image of a high interference in SOEs? This too seems to also only a scapegoat. In the private owners of interference from much deeper.Say directors of state enterprises often complain of the House was called as one form of intervention. But, I see, the call by the House was not to have weighed the consequences of calling by the owners of private companies. Moreover, the House of Representatives Commission VI who heads a state is proportional. Not a lot of strange things. Even one member of parliament in situ, Mumtaz Amin Rais, was like a member of parliament from England. If you ask a very short, dense and straight to the point. Less than a minute. Other members are also nothing to blaspheme without good reason. Clearly the intervention of private company owners far more profound.In the private sector also often found this fact: many owners of private companies who wants weird. Dictatorship they are also amazing! Very ordinary private company owners to impose its will. Thus, stories about the intervention of the owner, about the imposition of the will, and about the dictatorship of the private owner is much larger than in SOEs.What about the corporate climate? Actually, also the same. Just different nuances. Is not your private well is often squeezed by the magnitude of the dominance of the owner's family - especially if the owners finally had a son and daughter grow up and produce daughters-in-law?Thus not strong enough also the reason that an executive at state-owned enterprises is more difficult because less supportive corporate climate.How about political interference? It was thought very prominent political interference in SOEs. This, too, I doubt it. I see the hand that's more because it was invited by the executives themselves. In the private sector will also now contracted the disease. With so many owners of private companies to enter politics then maybe the hassles executives in private sector also will increase steadily. Do not you dizzy become owners of private executive ambition to enter politics?So I suspect the people who frequent blowing of discourse that became executives in SOEs are difficult are the ones who basically does not work. In this world of reasons, excuses, scapegoats and the like are too easy to find. People are often advised his superiors but failed in his job, he would likely reasonable "interfered too much anyway! '. Conversely, people who were given full trust but also failed she would have said "never look the hell! '.So in the end the actual return to Who is he! If you say to the directors in SOEs is difficult and work in the private sector was too difficult, then where dong working that good? Which is not difficult? Which does not bother? That does not stress? A big salary? Which facilities are good? Which could extravagance? Which can be arbitrarily?I can not answer that. The most appropriate answer is the person who lives a higher level than me. Not Rhenald Kasali or Tanri Abeng or Hermawan Kartajaya. Not Peter Drucker nor Jack Welch. The most appropriate answer to that question is a person who no longer enjoy his sleep yangpulas on Monday at 10.00 am under the railway bridge just repose Manggarai with cardboard. He is as good-delicious people. Freely humans. No debt thinkers, thinkers no targets, no responsibility thinkers. People like it was he who might actually be surprised to see people who are busy!My point: then stop complaining!I mean: stick with determination! Want to be directors of state enterprises or want in private. Or want to, he he, chose to live the most delicious!My point: if the option had been dropped we stay focused on that option. Whole-heartedly. There is no other thought except work, work, work!Rather than continue to complain, stop working. There are still many others who want to work. There are still many others who can show progress without complaining!Look at the board's state-owned banks. They are so advanced. In no way inferior to the directors of private banks. Whereas directors of state-owned banks were sandwiched between state bureaucratic rules and regulations are stricter than the central bank. Where there are directors who are so tightly controlled from the two departments as well as directors of the bank exceeds the SOEs? The proof of our state-owned banks remarkable.Look at the election marketeer of the year is already five years carried out by Marks Plus his Kartajaya Hermawan. Four consecutive years is a marketer of the yearnya SOE directors! The new private sector is the one time! The marketer of the year award from the state that is the type of people who are not good at complaining! They are the type of people who work, work, work!Look at the three CEOs of SOEs last week was selected as CEO of Enterprises of the Year: RJ Lino (Managing Director of IPCs-2), Tommy Soetomo (CEO Angkasapura-1) and Ignatius Jonan (Managing Director of Indonesian Railways). They are the ones who continue to work hard, sighing. They continue to produce achievements from the sidelines pinching bureaucracy and regulation. Even one of the three men continued to work hard while holding the pain is severe.See also the directors of SOEs that night to win the various categories of innovation in SOEs. They are powerful people who want to serve in the state.Sorry, this is probably the last time I used the word "serve in SOEs'. After this I want to delete the term "serve" it. The term "served in SOEs' nothing more than a hypocrisy. There is always a catch behind the term "serving at the state-owned 'it. Any party who uttered the word "serve in SOEs' surely there is not that he wants to convey. Lots of former state officials who want to continue to have a home office on the grounds already tens of years of service in the state. Too many people who use the term SOE devoted to the hidden purposes. Perhaps it was about time SOE no longer a place to serve, in a sense like that. Unless they really want to work hard in the state without salary! It's time to state just as a place to make achievements.